Originally uploaded by greenskeptic
I just spent the morning with a group of folks at Ashoka meeting with Orri Vigfússon, the vodka tycoon (ICY), Ashoka and Goldman fellow, and flyfisherman who is single-handely rescuing Atlantic salmon from the brink.
His idea is a simple one: buy the netting rights from commercial fishers across the North Atlantic, essentially paying commercial fishermen not to fish salmon in the North Atlantic.
His organization North Atlantic Salmon Fund (NASF) has also brokered moratorium agreements with several national governments. These efforts have dramatically improved salmon fish stocks in numerous countries.
According to NASF estimates, commercial open-sea fishing in the Atlantic has dropped by more than 75 percent in the last 15 years, and river anglers in several countries in areas where nets have been closed have reported substantial increases in salmon catches.
NASF estimates that in excess of five million North Atlantic salmon have been saved to date.
Orri told us that he needs 2-3 years to complete his work of purchasing and retiring the netting rights, then he wants NASF to turn its attention to restoring the historic salmon rivers of Central Europe, which he says is possible.
See: Goldman Prize
(P.S. Orri is not telling us how big was his last salmon in the photo...)
Posted via Flickr
Hi Green Skeptic:
Enjoyed your thoughts...
Check out my own blog action tribute...with animated clips, award-winning short documentaries, music videos, & more!
Posted by Christopher Bassoo, Canada
I wanted to thank you for the informative and enjoyable read. I have been sitting here with my coffee and laptop enjoying a Bassoo family evening. Again many thanks, warmest of regards Chris Bassoo, Toronto, Canada
Interesting article...sounds similar to a trend in the real estate sector which is the purchasing of environmental easements which can be very narrow in nature (ie. limiting development on specific parcel). My question is: If Mr. Vigfusson pays the salmon fishermen NOT to fish, what does this do to the overall supply and demand of the market? In the long term, doesn't this create a lack of salmon supply thereby increasing the cost to the consumer? Also, wouldn't this increased salmon value entice other fishermen to enter the market? These fishermen would have to be paid NOT to fish, right?
Another interesting view on global warming...
oh my god save the salmon...uh, what about the vodka guy basically side stepping the morality issue of underage drinking..why doesn't he pay liquor store owners not to sell his stuff, oh yeah..that's cuz he makes money
Here is an answer to johnnyboy's comment above, direct from Orri:
When we buyout fishermen, we actually buy out the right to fish and no other fishermen are allowed to use that right.
Also, we only buy out fishermen that fish for wild salmon. In theory this should raise the prices for the remaining fishermen but who are in any event getting fewer and fewer. In more and more countries it is no forbidden to sell wild salmon. The market however is virtually full of farmed salmon and the general public really does not know the difference.
Post a Comment