"How much oil seeps up from the seabed, aside from oil spills? Quite a lot, and a fascinating group of sea creatures thrives on it," writes William Broad in the New York Times Green Blog about sea creatures that thrive on natural oil seeps in the deep, dark ocean: Dark Ecosystems Nurtured by Oil.
"In 2003, the National Research Council released a comprehensive study, 'Oil in the Sea III: Inputs, Fates and Effects.' The 265-page report paints a global portrait of the petrochemical flows, both natural and unnatural. It turns out that the largest contributors [of petrochemicals in the ocean] far and away are the natural seeps, like those across the bottom of the gulf that power the dark ecosystems."
Of course, as one commentator pointed out, the BP Deepwater Horizon spill has leaked "an amount equal to 75 percent of the annual natural seepage worldwide, except it has occurred in 2 months in one specific location."
Challenging assumptions about how we live on the earth and protect our environment.
Showing posts with label Gulf of Mexico. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gulf of Mexico. Show all posts
22 June 2010
09 June 2010
Beyond Possible: Are the Plumes on Fire?
Live Stream from BP's Deep Water Horizon oil spill. Is that really fire under water?
Live Broadcast by Ustream.TV
Live Broadcast by Ustream.TV
Related articles by Zemanta
- NOAA Confirms Presence of Subsea Oil Plumes in Gulf of Mexico (shoppingblog.com)
- Salazar to be quizzed on offshore drilling (msnbc.msn.com)
- Do You Feel Lucky, Punk? Well do you? (eschatonblog.com)
- US Confirms Underwater Oil Plume (science.slashdot.org)
- The Different Appearances of Oil in New NASA Satellite Image (spacefellowship.com)
- BP shares tumble as US oil spill pressure prompts dividend fears (telegraph.co.uk)
- Huge Deep Water Oil Plumes Threaten Long-Term Environmental and Health Harm (insidesurgery.com)
18 May 2010
BP: Latest Effort Captures 1,000 Barrels of Leaking Oil Per Day
According to a report in yesterday's Environmental Leader, BP successfully connected a mile-long tube into a broken pipe at the Deepwater Horizon well to start capturing some of the leaking oil, which is being siphoned to a ship at the surface.
BP said it is capturing about 1,000 barrels per day in the Gulf of Mexico, a drop in the bucket compared to the 5,000 barrels (210,000 gallons/795,000 liters) it estimates to be leaking daily.
Read the full article here: BP Roundup – Latest Effort Captures 1,000 Barrels of Leaking Oil Per Day
The question is, do those estimates underestimate the amount of oil gushing from the sea floor?
Some scientists believe that oil is gushing out at a rate of somewhere between 25,000 to 80,000 barrels a day. The New York Times reported over the weekend that huge plumes of oil -- some 10 miles long, 3 miles wide and 300 feet thick -- have been found underwater in the Gulf.
BP has resisted efforts to determine the size of the leak, preferring to focus on containment efforts. They hope to have the leak stopped by the end of the week.
BP said it is capturing about 1,000 barrels per day in the Gulf of Mexico, a drop in the bucket compared to the 5,000 barrels (210,000 gallons/795,000 liters) it estimates to be leaking daily.
Read the full article here: BP Roundup – Latest Effort Captures 1,000 Barrels of Leaking Oil Per Day
The question is, do those estimates underestimate the amount of oil gushing from the sea floor?
Some scientists believe that oil is gushing out at a rate of somewhere between 25,000 to 80,000 barrels a day. The New York Times reported over the weekend that huge plumes of oil -- some 10 miles long, 3 miles wide and 300 feet thick -- have been found underwater in the Gulf.
BP has resisted efforts to determine the size of the leak, preferring to focus on containment efforts. They hope to have the leak stopped by the end of the week.
Related articles by Zemanta
- BP stonewalls as massive plumes of oil discovered under Gulf (dailykos.com)
- BP: Tube inserted into oil well riser, but no end to leak in sight (trueslant.com)
- BP claims to be slowing flow of oil into Mexican Gulf (guardian.co.uk)
- Massive oil plumes under US Gulf (news.bbc.co.uk)
- BP boasts of skimming 1,000 barrels per day from leak (americablog.com)
- Scientists Discover Huge Plumes in Gulf Spill That Peril Fish, Plants (themoderatevoice.com)
- BP has first success in containing oil spill (nationalpost.com)
- BP Doubles Estimate for Oil Captured in Gulf Spill (Update1) (businessweek.com)
Labels:
BP,
Deepwater Horizon,
Gulf of Mexico,
oil,
Oil Spill,
Seabed
30 April 2010
Two Coasts Tell Tale of Where We Are
What happened on two coasts in the US the past two weeks speaks to our energy reality. The two coasts tell us where we are.
Both events illustrate the conundrum in which we find ourselves early in the 21st Century and very early in the transition from one primary fuel source to the next.
First the good news: Consent was given by US Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar on Wednesday for Cape Wind, the long-stalled 468 MW wind farm project off the coast of Massachusetts. The project was held up by local interests concerned about the appearance of a line of 130 wind turbines located miles off the coast in the Horseshoe Shoal area of Nantucket Sound.
The second was the explosion, sinking, and subsequent leaking of a deep water oil facility last week, which by some estimates is now spewing 5,000 barrels (200,000 gallons) a day into the Gulf of Mexico from below the ocean floor. This spill is set to threaten the Gulf Coast, just five years after Hurricane Katrina devastated that region.
One of these events represents the future of our energy production: Cleaner, renewable, and with a free resource feed stock (the wind). The other represents a variation on the past: Dirty, dangerous, and dependent upon a dwindling feed stock (fossil fuels).
What people forget, however, whether celebrating the victory or decrying the disaster, is that we are not in a position to switch from the old to the new like a light switch in the kitchen.
We are very likely going to need the old to help foster the development of the new -- and our dependence upon the old isn't going away any time soon. Furthermore, because oil is running out, we are likely to see more risky and dangerous ventures to access what's left in the immediate future.
Extracting fossil fuels is a risky and dangerous business, as we've seen with this drilling disaster and last month's coal mine disaster in West Virginia. The sooner we can foster the transition off fossil fuels and to cleaner, renewable source the better off we will be.
But let's not forget where we are in that transition: we are just at the very beginning.
Both events illustrate the conundrum in which we find ourselves early in the 21st Century and very early in the transition from one primary fuel source to the next.
First the good news: Consent was given by US Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar on Wednesday for Cape Wind, the long-stalled 468 MW wind farm project off the coast of Massachusetts. The project was held up by local interests concerned about the appearance of a line of 130 wind turbines located miles off the coast in the Horseshoe Shoal area of Nantucket Sound.
The second was the explosion, sinking, and subsequent leaking of a deep water oil facility last week, which by some estimates is now spewing 5,000 barrels (200,000 gallons) a day into the Gulf of Mexico from below the ocean floor. This spill is set to threaten the Gulf Coast, just five years after Hurricane Katrina devastated that region.
One of these events represents the future of our energy production: Cleaner, renewable, and with a free resource feed stock (the wind). The other represents a variation on the past: Dirty, dangerous, and dependent upon a dwindling feed stock (fossil fuels).
What people forget, however, whether celebrating the victory or decrying the disaster, is that we are not in a position to switch from the old to the new like a light switch in the kitchen.
We are very likely going to need the old to help foster the development of the new -- and our dependence upon the old isn't going away any time soon. Furthermore, because oil is running out, we are likely to see more risky and dangerous ventures to access what's left in the immediate future.
Extracting fossil fuels is a risky and dangerous business, as we've seen with this drilling disaster and last month's coal mine disaster in West Virginia. The sooner we can foster the transition off fossil fuels and to cleaner, renewable source the better off we will be.
But let's not forget where we are in that transition: we are just at the very beginning.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
